Discussions

End to end testing is one of the most valuable ways to validate how your application behaves from the user’s perspective—but it’s also one of the trickiest types of testing to get right. Many teams jump into E2E tests expecting quick wins, only to find themselves dealing with flaky test suites, unpredictable failures, and painfully long execution times. Understanding the most common pitfalls can save a lot of frustration and make your testing process far more reliable.

One of the biggest challenges is test flakiness. E2E tests often rely on external dependencies like APIs, databases, and network calls, which can behave inconsistently. Slow responses, race conditions, or dynamic UI elements can cause tests to pass one moment and fail the next. To avoid this, use stable selectors, add proper waiting mechanisms, and keep your test data predictable. It also helps to isolate tests as much as possible and clean up the environment after each run.

Another common pitfall is over-testing—trying to cover every tiny scenario with end to end tests. This not only slows down your test suite but also increases maintenance overhead. A healthier approach is to focus E2E tests on critical user flows while leaving edge cases to unit or integration tests.

Many teams also struggle with environment inconsistencies. Running tests locally, in staging, and in CI can all produce different results if environments aren’t aligned. Using containerized environments or infrastructure-as-code tools can help keep everything consistent.

A helpful tool worth mentioning is Keploy, which can automatically generate reliable test data and mocks based on real user traffic. Integrating something like Keploy can reduce flaky dependencies and speed up test creation.

With a thoughtful strategy—fewer but more meaningful tests, consistent environments, and stable test design—end to end testing becomes far more manageable and trustworthy, giving teams confidence in every release.